Jacqueline Dimier’s Royal Oak II: Preserving Character at 29 mm

Jacqueline Dimier approached the 1976 women’s Royal Oak through proportions, preserving its character rather than abandoning its steel and automatic identity.

Abstract illustration of nested octagonal steel-grey forms and drafting lines, exploring watch proportions.
Abstract illustration of nested octagonal steel-grey forms and drafting lines, exploring watch proportions.
Original conceptual editorial illustration; not a photograph of a real watch or person.

2026-11-09 · Watches And More

How do you change a watch’s proportions without losing its personality? Jacqueline Dimier’s answer was unusually direct. In Audemars Piguet’s published recollection, she describes preserving the Royal Oak’s character and wanting it to remain big despite prevailing women’s-watch trends. AP Chronicles identifies the result as Model 8638—the first women’s Royal Oak, also called Royal Oak II—launched in 1976. [S2] [S1]

💡 Did You Know?

Audemars Piguet gives the case diameter as 29 mm, with eight visible screws retained around the octagonal steel bezel. Inside, the company selected Calibre 2062, measuring just 15.4 mm across. The compact dimensions belonged to both the exterior design and the mechanism—not simply to a smaller dial. [S1] [S1]

There was an unexpected setting for its debut, too. AP Chronicles records that the Royal Oak II launched at Parisian jeweller FRED before its presentation at the Basel Fair, and describes the reception as an immediate success. [S2]

⭐ Why It Matters

AP Chronicles frames the design as a challenge to the feminine aesthetic codes of its period: steel, automatic winding and visible screws all remained. Its account also makes an important distinction about authorship. The project was already under way, but Dimier brought it to fruition through a major overhaul of proportions and aesthetic harmony. This institutional history credits her with resolving the design, rather than originating every part of the project. [S2] [S2]

❤️ The W&M Take

Our take: the most compelling part of this story is the distinction between reducing dimensions and reducing ambition. We think Dimier’s emphasis on proportions offers a useful way to appreciate design: ask not only what changed, but what the designer refused to surrender. For us, character is something to translate thoughtfully, not a feature reserved for one size or one audience.

Sources

Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to keep these watch facts accurate, but the world of horology is full of myths, disputed stories, and fascinating trivia. Consider these facts a starting point for discovery rather than the final word. If you have corrections or additional insights, let us know—we’re always happy to keep the record ticking in the right direction.

Read Next

Watches And More · Watch Fact Archive · Companion site

When a familiar watch design changes size, which detail most needs to survive: its geometry, material, movement or overall proportions?


Discover more from WatchesAndMoreCO

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Jeffrey Guy (WatchesAndMore)

Welcome to Watches & More Co. – where time meets style. I’m passionate about all things horology, from classic mechanical movements to elegant dress watches and rugged tool pieces. This blog is my space to share reviews, insights, and style tips for fellow watch lovers and collectors. Whether you're new to the world of watches or a seasoned enthusiast, you'll find content here that informs, inspires, and sparks conversation. Beyond timepieces, I occasionally explore related accessories and lifestyle picks that complement a refined look. Thanks for stopping by – stay timeless.

Leave a Reply